Monday, March 11, 2019
Evidence Based Claim Essay
Elizabeth Moschella King and Obama make arguments against and for violence respectively however Kings rhetoric utilizes emotion and values, or pathos, to advance his idea of a certain civilization, while Obama uses logic and realism to advance his idea of facing the institution as it is. Though King and Obama be accepting the Nobel Peace valuate for different reasons, we find that they unify through their words in a way that makes them seem as though they arent decades apart. Each acknowledges that the mankind as it is, the good and the bad alike, needs to change.King accepted his honour for alone of the unbloody movements he has caused for the equality of moodys, yet he acknowledges that not both passive movements end in nonviolence. Fighting for what is right can very much lead to wounded justice, lying prostrate on the blood-flowing streets (line 48). King stock-still realizes that one day mankind will bow before the altars of divinity fudge and be crowned triumphan t over war and bloodshed (lines 53-54). It has grow clear that King uses his emotion and religious values to get his spirit level across to us he uses words with such a actor that can persuade his listeners to believe anything.He manipulates our minds and speaks with such a certainty that seems to connect with us the same way Obama does using logic and realism. Obama accepted his award for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. This means that he has accepted this prize for his efforts to make peace in a bum where it had seemed near impossible. Yet, Obama too addresses that peace cannot come about with only nonviolent actions. The world as it is is full of war and fighting for your beliefs. I causa the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people (lines 80-81).It is recognized that Evil does exist in the world. A nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitlers armies. Negotiations cannot convince al infrastructures leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism it is a recognition of fib the imperfections of man and the limits of reason (lines 81-85). Obama is using his way of logos when making these fact-based statements he is using a form of truth and logic to get a listener emotionally connected with the world and realizing all of the horrible events that expire everyday.In this way Obama and King are similar they both get the consultation emotionally attached and moved by the words spoken. Anyone who listens to or reads all one of their acceptance speeches realizes how humble they both are about the prize, and are ashamed they didnt do more to help the violent world. In a way, King would be proud of how far Obama has gotten in the world. red from a fight for justice led by King for black rights to Obama, a black, elected as the President of the United States, the world has interpreted a dramatic turn towards hope and prosperity.