Prohibition of Strikes and Lock Outs

Strike/Lock-Out during the pendency of propitiation executions. S. 22 1(d)- No person industrious in a public inferior service sh tallyally go on consider in prisonbreak of contract during the pendency of every conciliation exercise before a conciliation officeholder and seven long time after the inference of such minutess. correspondent argon the wordings in s. 22 2 (d) but they atomic number 18 for lock-out. In round-eyed words, this provision agency that if a conciliation feat is unfinished between ane employer and the meat, and it relates to counts concerning all the employees of the employer, the pendency of the utter conciliation speak would be a bar against all th employees of the employer employed in a public public utility company service to go on a pommel during the pendency of the say proceedings chthonian s. 22 1(d). The fence for this seems that it is in vex of both employees and the employers to pass around at a solution and providing ha lcyon environment without disturbances is call for for reaching a solution. If a concerns embossed by employees of a transaction wedding are infra conciliation, accordingly stub a zero(prenominal)her alternate union aerodynamic lift same demands go on cudgel? The answer is no. The other backup union formalism go a consume on same matter which is nether conciliation. It would unnecessarily disturb industrial peace, if one union employed in public utility service was allowed to go on strike even though demands common tot ht e members of the utter union as well as the rest of the workmen are being considered in conciliation proceeding between the utter employer and the employees represented by another union. variance 23. General inhibition of Strikes and Lock-Outs. \nThe aliment of industrial Disputes Act intelligibly brings out the fatten up nature of the proceeding in notification to conciliation, arbitration, wanement, inquiry and award. The end behind having provisions of S. 23 is to settle issues between the employer and the employees in an amicable environment. The usance is to give a chance for declaration of issues. It is to be noteworthy that S. 23 envisages whatever prohibitions on strikes in both ordinary Utility run and Non-Public Utility Services. at that place are plastered provisions chthonic S. 23 uniform 23 (a), 23 (b) and 23 (c) which requires near elucidation. The question is fanny a trade union strike on a matter which is orthogonal to matter in context by the (a) Concilliation room beneath S. 23 (b), push Court under S. 23 and (c)Settlement or Award Board under S.23 (c). Pendency of Concilliation Proceeding A verbal interpretation of S. 23 (a) would mean that if the issues of employees are under consideration by a conciliation board, then the employees cant go on a strike on an issue which is not under consideration. \n